Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hi Ray,
I think this helps me to understand what you mean: https://openthings.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/5000164006-using-a-different-server-for-ui-assetsBest regards,
MiroHi Ray,
Thanks for the explanation but I still don’t fully understand what UI/app changes means. Does this mean changes only to Android App?Best regards,
MiroHello Ray,
Did you add support for repeating start times that go over to the next day.Best regards,
MiroHi Ray,
Just to clarify something. Your announcement of issuing 2.1.9(9) was on August 22, 2021 at 6:36 pm (the first post). In the same post you say: * Allows program’s interval day to be as small as 1 (previously the minimum is 2). This is NOT fully available yet because it still requires UI/app changes to go with it, which we will complete in a few days.
After that there is no new release of the firmware and that is why I am wondering whether changes were implemented in UI.Hi Ray,
In your first post you have stated that: … This is NOT fully available yet because it still requires UI/app changes to go with it, which we will complete in a few days.Did you integrate these changes?
Best regards,
MiroRay,
I’ve just set Demo on your site to recreate this situation. And it is the same as at my place.Best regards,
MiroHello Ray,
I am testing with Repeat Count = 1. Firmware I am using is the latest – os_219_rev8.bin. It was the same with rev7.Best regards,
MiroHello,
I am a little bit confused with repeat function. If I set 5 zones in sequential mode, 20-20-20-10-10 minutes, repeated 1 time in 40 minutes interval and start in 19:30h I can see in Ppreview Programs all zones ordered as expected. If I change the start time to 23:00h then 1st repeat is as expected but then only zones 1 and 2 are repeated.Can somebody tell me what is happening.
Best regards,
MiroHi lordshandyman,
My current controller is DIY (designed by me – not commercial and not targeted to be). It was designed 8-9 years ago and it is based on Microchip MCU and Microchip TCP/IP Stack. It is still working but I stopped to deal with it as I don’t have time to develop new features. I want to change it with one that have Home Assistant support and wireless connectivity. Actually it is a part of a module based DIY automation system using CAN bus. Modules are connected to WEB server (Microchip TCP/IP stack based) using CAN bus. I have started changing all my modules with Home Assistant compatible devices. And my irrigation controller is one of the two modules left to be changed.
I saw OS has Home Assistant support and I want to migrate to it. Stations working in parallel in a flexible way is one thing that I want to have as well Tipping bucket support.Best regards,
MiroHi lordshandyman,
Just want to add something to my example. I can set s4 to work with s2. It looks like it is the same but using the above example my current irrigation controller will act as follows – s1, s3, s4 in parallel with s2, s5.Best regards,
MiroHi lordshandyman,
Yes, this obviously can be a partial workaround but it is not flexible. Changing wiring is far from flexible. About other suggestion… not good too. What if you want station 2 to work in parallel with station 4 – then the only solution will be changing wiring…
My current irrigation controller can handle this. I can set any station to work with any other in parallel and act as 1 station (for example s2 with s4, in this case the order of irrigating in case of 5 stations will be s1, s2 and s4 in parallel, s3, s5). And I don’t have to change wiring.
One more thing I miss in OS is support of tipping bucket sensor. May be I am not right but at first look I don’t see such a support.Best regards,
Miro
